The programme was the first in a series, it looks at films and tries to unpick the truths behind the stories. I suspect as we get nearer to the 100 years anniversary we will see a few more programmes like this.In total I did not think the programme was too bad. A few niggles in the first section, had me shouting at the the television, but by the time we moved onto the scientific theory it improved.
The question of Captain Smiths perceived ‘guilt’ in the events is always raised. Mr Louden-Brown’s theories of a nervous breakdown are similar to my own. I would further have explored the way commands were interpreted and the devastating effect that would have.
It is said she was going too fast. This is all in light of hindsight, and the distance of almost 100 years.
The Californian controversy was covered with an explanation of Super-Refraction by Francois Hugo. The curve of the Earth, and weather conditions causing a vessel to appear closer than it was in reality. The programme did not mention that Titanic herself was not found in her last posted location.
No mention was made of the US and UK investigations and the materials available there. The programme mentioned 'Titanic' is be released in 3D to coincide with the anniversary.
Contributor: Morag Irving BA (OPEN)., Dip.Lit. e-mail: moragirvinguk@aol.com Tel:01733 345581
No comments:
Post a Comment